|
How to Manage PestsUC Pest Management Guidelines
AlfalfaBlue Alfalfa Aphid and Pea Aphid
Blue alfalfa aphid: Acyrthosiphon kondoi
|
DESCRIPTION OF THE PESTS (View photos to identify aphids)
The pea aphid and the blue alfalfa aphid are large green aphids with
long legs, antennae, cornicles, and cauda. They are very similar in appearance
but can be distinguished from each other by examining the antennae: the
antennae of the pea aphid has narrow dark bands at the tip of each segment,
whereas those of the blue alfalfa aphid are uniformly brown.
A pink biotype of the pea aphid has recently been found in the central valley of California, including Fresno, Kings, Tulare, Yolo and Sacramento counties. Except for its pink color, it is identical in appearance to the green biotype. The pink biotype causes similar damage to the green pea aphid and management practices are the same, but some studies have suggested it may be partially resistant to parasitization by Aphidius ervi and may also circumvent some of the pea aphid resistance bred into many alfalfa cultivars.
Both the blue alfalfa aphid and the two strains of the pea aphid prefer cool temperatures (optimal temperature for development of blue alfalfa aphid is 60°F) and reach damaging levels in spring, but blue alfalfa aphid is more tolerant than pea aphid of cool temperatures and appears earlier in spring. Pea aphid often reoccurs in fall as well. Both species may be present in alfalfa fields at the same time as the alfalfa weevils. The blue alfalfa aphid prefers the plant terminals while pea aphid is usually more generally distributed. Both species prefer the stems to the leaves.
These aphids feed on alfalfa and inject a toxin that retards growth, reduces yield, and may even kill plants. Damage can also reduce the alfalfa's feed value. A black fungus, sooty mold, grows on the honeydew excreted by the aphid reduces palatability to livestock. Damage is more severe on short hay than on taller alfalfa for both species. The toxin injected by the blue alfalfa aphid is more potent than that of the pea aphid.
Using resistant varieties of alfalfa and encouraging populations of natural enemies are very important in managing blue alfalfa aphid and pea aphid. It is important to distinguish these two species because blue alfalfa aphid causes more damage than pea aphid, and the two species have different treatment thresholds. Natural enemies, especially lady beetles, are monitored along with the aphids to determine the need for treatment. Aphids frequently become problems when their natural enemies are disrupted by weevil sprays. Border harvesting or strip cutting can be important for preserving natural enemies.
Resistant Varieties
Planting alfalfa varieties resistant to blue alfalfa aphid and pea aphid
has been the most effective means of controlling aphids in alfalfa. Prolonged
periods of below-normal temperatures, however, may lower resistance to blue
alfalfa aphid injury and result in some crop injury. Studies in the eastern
U.S. have shown that the pink biotype of the pea aphid easily overcame
resistance in a number of cultivars with the exception of CUF 101. When
selecting varieties, consult your farm advisor for information on resistant
varieties suited to your area, or check the the current leaflet Winter Survival
Fall Dormancy & Pest Resistance Ratings for Alfalfa Varieties from the National Alfalfa Alliance Web site. Additionally, a yearly
alfalfa variety report can be found at http://alfalfa.ucdavis.edu.
Biological Control (View
photos online)
The most significant aphid predators are several species of lady
beetles, including Hippodamia convergens and Coccinella septempunctata that attack and consume both of these aphid species;
treatment thresholds for pea aphid are based on the number of lady beetle
adults and larvae present. Green lacewings can also be important in regulating
aphids and many other predators including bigeyed bugs (Geocoris spp.), damsel bugs (Nabis spp.), and syrphid fly larvae also play a role. The
major parasite of the pea aphid is Aphidius smithi while the parasite A. ervi attacks both species. However, several studies have
suggested that the pink biotype of pea aphid shows signs of partial resistance
to A. ervi. Large golden-brown aphid mummies on the upper
surfaces of leaves indicate parasitization. When parasites are present, be
careful when treating for aphids and other insects. Parasites frequently
provide adequate control. Aphids may also be controlled by a naturally
occurring fungal disease, which is most prevalent during cool, rainy, or foggy
weather.
Use border-strip cutting during harvest to help maintain populations of parasites and predators within the field. (For more details, see BORDER-STRIP HARVESTING.)
The use of resistant varieties, biological control, and cultural control are acceptable to use on an organically certified crop. Organically certified insecticides such as azadirachtin (Neemix), neem oil (Trilogy), and pyrethrin (PyGanic) are registered for use on alfalfa to control aphids. Studies conducted in California, however, have shown that at best they provide some suppression of populations but do not control them.
Start to monitor fields in February for blue alfalfa aphid and pea aphid and continue monitoring through spring. In fall resume monitoring pea and blue alfalfa aphids by combining with cowpea monitoring as described in APHID MONITORING.
If natural enemies fail to keep the aphid populations in check, an insecticide treatment may be necessary. Economic treatment thresholds for both aphids are as follows (if both species are present, use the blue alfalfa aphid treatment levels):
Plant height | Pea aphids | Blue alfalfa aphids |
---|---|---|
Under 10 inches | 40 to 50 per stem | 10 to 12 per stem |
10 to 20 inches | 70 to 80 per stem | 40 to 50 per stem |
Over 20 inches | 100 + per stem | 40 to 50 per stem |
Common name | Amount per acre** | REI‡ | PHI‡ | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Example trade name) | (hours) | (days) | |||||
UPDATED: 8/15 |
|||||||
|
|||||||
The following are ranked with the pesticides having the greatest IPM value listed first—the most effective and least harmful to natural enemies, honey bees, and the environment are at the top of the table. When choosing a pesticide, consider information relating to air and water quality, resistance management, and the pesticide's properties and application timing. Not all registered pesticides are listed. Always read the label of the product being used. | |||||||
A. | FLUPYRADIFURONE | ||||||
(Sivanto 200SL) | 7–10.5 fl oz | 12 | 7 | ||||
MODE-OF-ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 4D | |||||||
B. | FLONICAMID | ||||||
(Beleaf 50SG) | 2.8 oz | 12 | 62 | ||||
MODE-OF-ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 9C | |||||||
COMMENTS: Use allowed under a 24c registration (SLN CA-140006). | |||||||
C. | CHLORPYRIFOS* | ||||||
(Lorsban Advanced) | 1–2 pt | 24 | See comments | ||||
MODE-OF-ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 1B | |||||||
COMMENTS: Do not apply when bees are present. Avoid drift and tailwater runoff into surface waters. Preharvest interval is 7 days for cutting and grazing when 0.5 pt/acre used, 14 days for 1 pt/acre, and 21 days for rates above 1 pt/acre. Certain formulations emit high amounts of volatile organic compounds (VOCs); use low-VOC formulations. Regulations affect use for the San Joaquin Valley from May 1 to October 31, 2015 and 2016. Review the Department of Pesticide Regulation's updated fact sheet . | |||||||
D. | DIMETHOATE | ||||||
(Dimethoate 2.67EC) | Label rates | 48 | See comments | ||||
MODE-OF-ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 1B | |||||||
COMMENTS: Preharvest interval (PHI) is 10 days for harvest or pasturing; for alfalfa seed: do not feed or graze livestock on treated crops, hay threshings, or stubble within 20 days of application. Check label to see if product allows only one application per year or per cutting. Do not apply when bees are present. | |||||||
E. | METHOMYL* | ||||||
(Lannate SP) | 0.5–1 lb | 48 | 7 | ||||
MODE-OF-ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 1A | |||||||
COMMENTS: Highly toxic to bees: do not spray directly or allow drift onto blooming crops or weeds where bees are foraging. | |||||||
F. | LAMBDA-CYHALOTHRIN* | ||||||
(Warrior II with Zeon) | 1.28–1.92 fl oz | 24 | See comments | ||||
MODE-OF-ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 3A | |||||||
COMMENTS: Preharvest interval (PHI) is 1 day for forage and 7 days for hay. Can be disruptive to natural enemies. Highly toxic to bees; do not spray directly or allow to drift onto blooming crops or weeds where bees are foraging. | |||||||
G. | ZETA-CYPERMETHRIN* | ||||||
(Mustang) | 2.4–4.3 fl oz | 12 | See comments | ||||
MODE-OF-ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 3A | |||||||
COMMENTS: Preharvest interval (PHI) is 3 days for cutting or grazing and 7 days for harvesting seed. Can be disruptive to natural enemies. Highly toxic to bees; do not spray directly or allow to drift onto blooming crops or weeds where bees are foraging. | |||||||
** | See label for dilution rates. | ||||||
‡ | Restricted entry interval (REI) is the number of hours (unless otherwise noted) from treatment until the treated area can be safely entered without protective clothing. Preharvest interval (PHI) is the number of days from treatment to harvest. In some cases the REI exceeds the PHI. The longer of two intervals is the minimum time that must elapse before harvest. | ||||||
* | Permit required from county agricultural commissioner for purchase or use. | ||||||
1 | Rotate chemicals with a different mode-of-action Group number, and do not use products with the same mode-of-action Group number more than twice per season to help prevent the development of resistance. For example, the organophosphates have a Group number of 1B; chemicals with a 1B Group number should be alternated with chemicals that have a Group number other than 1B. Mode of action Group numbers are assigned by IRAC (Insecticide Resistance Action Committee). For additional information, see their Web site at http://www.irac-online.org/. |
UC IPM Pest Management Guidelines:
Alfalfa
UC ANR Publication
3430
L. D. Godfrey, Entomology, UC Davis
E. T. Natwick, UC Cooperative Extension, Imperial County
P. B. Goodell, Entomology, Kearney Agricultural Center, Parlier
R. F. Long, UC Cooperative Extension, Yolo County
V. M. Barlow, UC Cooperative Extension, Riverside County and UC IPM Program
PDF: To display a PDF document, you may need to use a PDF reader.